![]() "The certification question remains for another day," he wrote. The judge also ruled that Romack did not show evidence that a classwide injunction is needed. "Money damages will solve this problem, if there is one," he wrote. If Romack chooses that route, the court can make a decision later regarding money and whether the company owes Romack a refund, Alsup added. That way, he'll have time to download his data, Alsup said. In a ruling issued Wednesday, Alsup narrowed the scope of the Romack's "vast injunction" request by holding that the man can get individual relief from Bitcasa's deletion only if he pays another $99 for a one-month extension under a new data plan. 18 that he had removed just two to three of his nearly 7.7 terabytes of data in five days with his computer running "virtually 24/7."Īccording to Bitcasa, 7.7 terabytes is enough to store 1.6 million songs, 2.7 million photos, or 4,000 high-definition movies. But Alsup also reminded Romack that no class had yet been certified. District Judge William Alsup granted the temporary restraining order last week, barring Bitcasa from deleting anybody's data until at least Nov. 15 or to start deleting their data.īut Bitcasa only gave customers 23 days to delete their data before it did so for them - an announcement that prompted Romack's request for an injunction, since he claims to have about 8 terabytes to remove. The man claims that Bitcasa breached its contract with users by forcing them to either accept a new, more expensive plan by Nov. Shawn Romack filed a class action suit against Bitcasa last week, less than a month after the company announced it would end its "Infinite" storage plan. ![]() I logged in on 3 occasions to perform the transfer until the site blipped and all my data was in the new system, because the progress bar was certainly frozen at 0% every time I tried the transfer.SAN FRANCISCO (CN) - A man who sued a cloud-storage service for ending its unlimited data storage plan is getting what he asked for - kind of. Every new client (they were all replaced) is still littered with bugs. ![]() Also the new system was incredibly buggy. ![]() Hopefully users read their email notice, took action and had a good enough ISP to complete the transfer before the deadline. On top of this, their encryption design required each user to download and re-upload their data. This was a total failure for a "backup" company. Recently Bitcasa decided to overhaul their system and required every user to login and manually perform a transfer of their files to the new system, in < 30 days, or their data would be deleted. If you don't use mirroring, then the files are only available online and through a temporary cache that expires after several days since the last time you downloaded it. Their "mirror" feature allows offline storage across multiple devices, but only the device that originally created the file can update it. The service offers no ability to sync files/directories offline on multiple devices like dropbox. So if you wanted to access something other than a photo, video or audio, there were multiple hoops to jump through. Only recently was the Android client updated so that you could open files with something other than their proprietary browser. I use the web interface, the Windows, and Android clients. It has a number of shortcomings in the feature, policy and reliability areas. The ability to have both backup and sync in one service attracted me. I've been trying this out for several months. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |